OCZ-VERTEX3
User Benchmarks
| Model | Type | Score | Seq. Read MB | Seq. Write MB | Read 4k64QD | Write 4k64QD | Read Access msek. | Write Access msek. |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 240 | 1024 | 474 | 228 | 193.30 | 225.79 | 0.20 | 0.07 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 120 | 846 | 480 | 133 | 193.89 | 77.63 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 120 | 806 | 425 | 140 | 151.59 | 149.16 | 0.14 | 0.05 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 90 | 789 | 447 | 114 | 171.06 | 99.44 | 0.12 | 0.05 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 120 | 783 | 423 | 141 | 109.08 | 120.06 | 0.21 | 0.04 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 60 | 661 | 434 | 74 | 109.23 | 71.79 | 0.18 | 0.07 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 60 | 661 | 424 | 84 | 105.16 | 82.76 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 60 | 634 | 407 | 77 | 98.56 | 68.51 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 60 | 631 | 408 | 78 | 83.87 | 77.01 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| OCZ-VERTEX3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The OCZ Vertex 3 is a SATA III solid-state drive (SSD) that was launched in 2012. It was among the pioneering SSDs to leverage the SATA III interface, allowing it to achieve significantly faster data transfer rates compared to its predecessors. This drive was available in various capacities: 60 GB, 120 GB, 240 GB, and 480 GB. It utilizes Micron's 25nm synchronous Multi-Level Cell (MLC) NAND flash memory and is powered by the SandForce SF-2281 series SSD processor. With sequential read and write speeds of up to 550 MB/s and 520 MB/s respectively, it marked a significant performance milestone in the SSD market.
Historical Significance and Performance
The OCZ Vertex 3 was a high-performance SSD during its prime, recognized as one of the first SSDs to break the 500 MB/s barrier for both read and write speeds. This made it a popular choice among gamers and other performance-oriented users who required swift data access and transfer rates. Although it has since been outpaced by more modern SSDs, the Vertex 3 remains a testament to the rapid advancements in storage technology at the time of its release.Key Specifications
- Capacity Options: 60 GB, 120 GB, 240 GB, or 480 GB
- Interface: SATA III (6 Gb/s)
- Form Factor: 2.5-inch
- NAND Flash: Micron 25nm synchronous MLC
- Controller: SandForce SF-2281 series
- Sequential Read Speed: Up to 550 MB/s
- Sequential Write Speed: Up to 520 MB/s
- Random Read Speed: Up to 85,000 IOPS
- Random Write Speed: Up to 80,000 IOPS
- Maximum Power Consumption: 7 W
- Operating Temperature: 0°C to 70°C
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong Performance: Despite its age, the OCZ Vertex 3 still offers robust performance for many applications, especially when compared to traditional hard drives.
- Reliability and Durability: The use of synchronous NAND flash and the SandForce controller provides reliable performance and durability, making it suitable for everyday use.
- Advanced Features: Supports TRIM, which helps maintain SSD performance over time, and DuraWrite technology, which extends the lifespan of the NAND flash by reducing write amplification.
Cons:
- Outdated Technology: The Vertex 3's performance is now surpassed by newer SSDs with more advanced technologies like TLC or 3D NAND flash, which offer better speed and efficiency.
- Cost Efficiency: Synchronous NAND flash, while offering better performance, is generally more expensive than asynchronous NAND, which is used in some modern budget SSDs.
Conclusion
The OCZ Vertex 3 remains a notable SSD in the history of storage technology. Although it is no longer at the cutting edge, it still provides a good balance of performance and durability. For users looking to upgrade from a traditional HDD or needing a dependable SSD for everyday use and light gaming, the Vertex 3 is a solid choice. However, those seeking the latest in SSD technology and the highest possible performance may want to consider newer models that utilize TLC or 3D NAND flash technologies.
In summary, the OCZ Vertex 3 stands as a testament to the rapid evolution of SSDs, offering a glimpse into the performance and capabilities that were groundbreaking at the time of its release. It continues to be a viable option for users who need reliable and durable storage without the need for the very latest and fastest technology.